Content ID:
Field:


  • About Smithsonian
  • Email Updates
  • Member Services
  • Shop
  • Archive
Smithsonian.com
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • Smithsonian Channel
  • goSmithsonian
  • Air & Space magazine
  • Home
  • History & Archaeology
  • People & Places
  • Science & Nature
  • Arts & Culture
  • Travel
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Games & Puzzles
  • Subscribe
  • Arts & Culture

In the Name of the Law

How to win arguments without really trying

  • By Richard Conniff
  • Smithsonian magazine, October 2007

Article Tools

  • Font
  • Share/Save/Bookmark Share
  • Email
  • Print
  • Digg Digg
  • Comments
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • RSS
  • Reddit Reddit
    More from Smithsonian.com
    • Turning a New Leaf

    I like to collect gratuitous opinions served up as laws of social behavior. Murphy's Law ("If anything can go wrong, it will") is the most famous, but the obscure ones are more fun. Say, for instance, that someone in an argument starts to foam at the mouth. You mildly remark, "What you're saying is a perfect instance of Benford's Law of Controversy," and it will take a Google search for the poor sap to figure out that you have insulted him: Benford's Law states that passion in any argument is inversely proportional to the amount of real information advanced.

    Godwin's Law is also handy. It holds that the longer an argument drags on, the likelier someone will stoop to a Hitler or Nazi analogy. And in common practice (other than in appropriate contexts, such as discussions of genocide), when an adversary tries it, you have only to say "Godwin's Law" and a trapdoor falls open, plunging your rival into a pool of hungry crocodiles. Sweet, no?

    Sweeter still, these little laws allow us to sound intellectual without having to do any homework. That's why people are always citing the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. That's also why they almost always get it wrong. The Uncertainty Principle actually has to do with physics, and let's just say that if you read it, your head will explode. So what's that nice idea about how observation inevitably alters the thing being observed? That's "the observer effect." But nobody calls it that because it lacks smarty-pants heft. What we really need is the Heisenberg Probability Principle, which states that anybody mentioning Heisenberg is likely a pompous twit. (And may I be the first to plead guilty as charged?)

    Some of these rules actually hold precious wisdom. Hegel's Paradox, for instance, says, "Man learns from history that man learns nothing from history." And Clarke's First Law, coined by science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke, nails the nature of wisdom: "When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible he is almost certainly wrong."

    Once, in Ireland, I ran across a statement by a 19th-century cleric that struck me as profound: "It is almost impossible to exaggerate the complete unimportance of almost everything." I've never been able to track down the source. (But that's unimportant.) In any case, Sturgeon's Revelation, named after science fiction writer Theodore Sturgeon, gives the same idea a nice American spin: "Ninety percent of everything is crud."

    The workplace has spawned more than its share of such obiter dicta. Thus the Dilbert Principle says, "The most ineffective workers are systematically moved to the place where they can do the least damage: management." But Joy's Law, coined by Sun Microsystems co-founder Bill Joy, captures every manager's sinking sense of despair: "No matter who you are, most of the smartest people work for someone else." Harried tech workers like to cite Brooks' Law, from software engineer Frederick P. Brooks: "Adding manpower to a late software project makes it later." Or as Brooks also put it, "The bearing of a child takes nine months, no matter how many women are assigned."

    Impatient bosses often strike back with Parkinson's Law: "Work expands to fill the time allotted for its completion." In fact, my editor just showed up at the door to remind me that time's up.

    "Don't be such a deadline Nazi," I snapped.

    "Godwin's Law," he replied.

    I like to collect gratuitous opinions served up as laws of social behavior. Murphy's Law ("If anything can go wrong, it will") is the most famous, but the obscure ones are more fun. Say, for instance, that someone in an argument starts to foam at the mouth. You mildly remark, "What you're saying is a perfect instance of Benford's Law of Controversy," and it will take a Google search for the poor sap to figure out that you have insulted him: Benford's Law states that passion in any argument is inversely proportional to the amount of real information advanced.

    Godwin's Law is also handy. It holds that the longer an argument drags on, the likelier someone will stoop to a Hitler or Nazi analogy. And in common practice (other than in appropriate contexts, such as discussions of genocide), when an adversary tries it, you have only to say "Godwin's Law" and a trapdoor falls open, plunging your rival into a pool of hungry crocodiles. Sweet, no?

    Sweeter still, these little laws allow us to sound intellectual without having to do any homework. That's why people are always citing the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. That's also why they almost always get it wrong. The Uncertainty Principle actually has to do with physics, and let's just say that if you read it, your head will explode. So what's that nice idea about how observation inevitably alters the thing being observed? That's "the observer effect." But nobody calls it that because it lacks smarty-pants heft. What we really need is the Heisenberg Probability Principle, which states that anybody mentioning Heisenberg is likely a pompous twit. (And may I be the first to plead guilty as charged?)

    Some of these rules actually hold precious wisdom. Hegel's Paradox, for instance, says, "Man learns from history that man learns nothing from history." And Clarke's First Law, coined by science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke, nails the nature of wisdom: "When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible he is almost certainly wrong."

    Once, in Ireland, I ran across a statement by a 19th-century cleric that struck me as profound: "It is almost impossible to exaggerate the complete unimportance of almost everything." I've never been able to track down the source. (But that's unimportant.) In any case, Sturgeon's Revelation, named after science fiction writer Theodore Sturgeon, gives the same idea a nice American spin: "Ninety percent of everything is crud."

    The workplace has spawned more than its share of such obiter dicta. Thus the Dilbert Principle says, "The most ineffective workers are systematically moved to the place where they can do the least damage: management." But Joy's Law, coined by Sun Microsystems co-founder Bill Joy, captures every manager's sinking sense of despair: "No matter who you are, most of the smartest people work for someone else." Harried tech workers like to cite Brooks' Law, from software engineer Frederick P. Brooks: "Adding manpower to a late software project makes it later." Or as Brooks also put it, "The bearing of a child takes nine months, no matter how many women are assigned."

    Impatient bosses often strike back with Parkinson's Law: "Work expands to fill the time allotted for its completion." In fact, my editor just showed up at the door to remind me that time's up.

    "Don't be such a deadline Nazi," I snapped.

    "Godwin's Law," he replied.

     
    Comments

    Terrific Article! It reminds me of the Science Creative Quarterly's recent collection of scientific eponyms, where readers submit their own laws. I hadn't heard of several of the laws you listed, and you clued me into the origins of some of the one's I heard before, like "You can't make a baby in one month with nine women." Thanks!

    Posted by Ryan Somma on January 21,2008 | 06:22 PM

    I know this is a late comment... but wanted you to know that I really enjoyed this piece! I liked it so much I created a poll around it on BuzzDash which they posted! I don't know if you can see this but here is the link: http://www.buzzdash.com/?page=buzzbite&BB_id=98736

    Posted by Glorac on July 18,2008 | 12:32 AM

    Post a Comment


    Name: (required)

    Email: (required)

    Comment:

    Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.



    Advertisement


    Most Popular Video

    • Newest
    • Most Viewed

    Mammoth vs. Mastodon

    The Photography of Timothy H. O’Sullivan

    The Cowboys of R.A. Brown Ranch

    (4:11)

    Silky Sifakas: The Angels of the Forest

    (3:26)

    View All Newest Videos »

    Mustangs: Spirits of the Wild West

    (04:18)

    The Sights and Tastes of Hanoi

    (02:21)

    Unearthing Our Roots

    The Art of Gaman: Crafts from the Japanese Internment Camps

    (4:59)

    View All Most Popular Videos »

    Most Popular

    • Viewed
    • Emailed
    • Commented
    1. The Search for the Guggenheim Treasure
    2. A Closer Look at Evolutionary Faces
    3. Top Ten Reasons to Beware the Ides of March
    4. Beavers: The Engineers of the Forest
    5. Who's Fueling Whom?
    6. The Political History of Cap and Trade
    7. Photo Contest Finalist - Yang Mai Yong Mountain Under Moonlight
    8. Henrietta Lacks’ ‘Immortal’ Cells
    9. Photo Contest Finalist - A group of young Menonite women at the scenic overlook
    10. Photo Contest Finalist - Lonely coffee break
    1. The Search for the Guggenheim Treasure
    2. Henrietta Lacks’ ‘Immortal’ Cells
    3. The Political History of Cap and Trade
    4. Top Ten Reasons to Beware the Ides of March
    5. Beavers: The Engineers of the Forest
    6. Hypatia, Ancient Alexandria’s Great Female Scholar
    7. Searching for Hanoi's Ultimate Pho
    8. A Closer Look at Evolutionary Faces
    9. Ireland's Forgotten Sons Recovered Two Centuries Later
    10. Gobekli Tepe: The World’s First Temple?
    1. The Search for the Guggenheim Treasure
    2. Top Ten Reasons to Beware the Ides of March
    3. A Closer Look at Evolutionary Faces
    4. Who's Fueling Whom?
    5. Photo Contest Finalist - Yang Mai Yong Mountain Under Moonlight
    6. Gobekli Tepe: The World’s First Temple?
    7. The Political History of Cap and Trade
    8. Barrow, Alaska: Ground Zero for Climate Change
    9. Decade by Decade
    10. Photo Contest Finalist - A restful moment for a white pelican

    - - - Advertisements - - -


    Heritage Month

    Women's History Month

    Explore how powerful women have shaped American history, from our first ladies to our Navy cadets to acclaimed artists and writers.

    Join Us

    Facebook

    Facebook

    Become a fan of Smithsonian magazine's official Facebook page!

    Twitter

    Follow Smithsonian magazine on Twitter

    In The Magazine

    April 2010 Issue Cover

    April 2010

    • Probing the Biggest Mystery in the Universe
    • All-American Monsters
    • Return to Indonesia
    • Saving the Silkies
    • Glimpses of the Lost World

    View Table of Contents »

    Smithsonian magazine presents

    Vote for the 7th Contest People's Choice Award

    Check out the 50 shots our editors named finalists and help pick a winner

    • Smithsonian Store
    • Smithsonian Journeys

    Triple-Strand Bracelet

    Item No. 48258

    Opera Lover's Italy

    Opera and Cuisine in Puglia, Basilicata, Campania and Rome (July 15-24, 2010)



    View full archiveRecent Issues

    • April 2010 Issue Cover
      Apr 2010


    • Mar 2010

    • February 2010 Issue Cover
      Feb 2010

    Newsletter

    Sign up for regular email updates from Smithsonian magazine, including free newsletters, special offers and current news updates.

    Subscribe Now

    About Us

    Smithsonian.com expands on Smithsonian magazine's in-depth coverage of history, science, nature, the arts, travel, world culture and technology. Join us regularly as we take a dynamic and interactive approach to exploring modern and historic perspectives on the arts, sciences, nature, world culture and travel, including videos, blogs and a reader forum.

    Explore our Brands

    • goSmithsonian.com
    • Smithsonian Air & Space Museum
    • Smithsonian Institution
    • Smithsonian Catalogue
    • Smithsonian Journeys
    • Smithsonian Channel
    • Site Map
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright
    • About Smithsonian
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Reader Panel
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Topics

    Smithsonian Institution

    Produced by Clickability